On 20/11/2020 11:51, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:39 AM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 20/11/2020 10:18, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:28 AM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 20/11/2020 09:06, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>>>> On 19/11/2020 15:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>>> The media model assumes that buffers are all preallocated, so that
>>>>>> when a media pipeline is running we never miss a deadline because the
>>>>>> buffers aren't allocated or available.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This means we cannot fix the v4l follow_pfn usage through
>>>>>> mmu_notifier, without breaking how this all works. The only real fix
>>>>>> is to deprecate userptr support for VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP mappings and
>>>>>> tell everyone to cut over to dma-buf memory sharing for zerocopy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> userptr for normal memory will keep working as-is, this only affects
>>>>>> the zerocopy userptr usage enabled in 50ac952d2263 ("[media]
>>>>>> videobuf2-dma-sg: Support io userptr operations on io memory").
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Actually, cancel this Acked-by.
>>>>
>>>> So let me see if I understand this right: VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP mappings can
>>>> move around. There is a mmu_notifier that can be used to be notified when
>>>> that happens, but that can't be used with media buffers since those buffers
>>>> must always be available and in the same place.
>>>>
>>>> So follow_pfn is replaced by unsafe_follow_pfn to signal that what is attempted
>>>> is unsafe and unreliable.
>>>>
>>>> If CONFIG_STRICT_FOLLOW_PFN is set, then unsafe_follow_pfn will fail, if it
>>>> is unset, then it writes a warning to the kernel log but just continues while
>>>> still unsafe.
>>>>
>>>> I am very much inclined to just drop VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP support in the media
>>>> subsystem. For vb2 there is a working alternative in the form of dmabuf, and
>>>> frankly for vb1 I don't care. If someone really needs this for a vb1 driver,
>>>> then they can do the work to convert that driver to vb2.
>>>>
>>>> I've added Mauro to the CC list and I'll ping a few more people to see what
>>>> they think, but in my opinion support for USERPTR + VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP
>>>> should just be killed off.
>>>>
>>>> If others would like to keep it, then frame_vector.c needs a comment before
>>>> the 'while' explaining why the unsafe_follow_pfn is there and that using
>>>> dmabuf is the proper alternative to use. That will make it easier for
>>>> developers to figure out why they see a kernel warning and what to do to
>>>> fix it, rather than having to dig through the git history for the reason.
>>>
>>> I'm happy to add a comment, but otherwise if you all want to ditch
>>> this, can we do this as a follow up on top? There's quite a bit of
>>> code that can be deleted and I'd like to not hold up this patch set
>>> here on that - it's already a fairly sprawling pain touching about 7
>>> different subsystems (ok only 6-ish now since the s390 patch landed).
>>> For the comment, is the explanation next to unsafe_follow_pfn not good
>>> enough?
>>
>> No, because that doesn't mention that you should use dma-buf as a replacement.
>> That's really the critical piece of information I'd like to see. That doesn't
>> belong in unsafe_follow_pfn, it needs to be in frame_vector.c since it's
>> vb2 specific.
>
> Ah makes sense, I'll add that.
>
>>>
>>> So ... can I get you to un-cancel your ack?
>>
>> Hmm, I really would like to see support for this to be dropped completely.
>>
>> How about this: just replace follow_pfn() by -EINVAL instead of unsafe_follow_pfn().
>>
>> Add a TODO comment that this code now can be cleaned up a lot. Such a clean up patch
>> can be added on top later, and actually that is something that I can do once this
>> series has landed.
>>
>> Regardless, frame_vector.c should mention dma-buf as a replacement in a comment
>> since I don't want users who hit this issue to have to dig through git logs
>> to find that dma-buf is the right approach.
>>
>> BTW, nitpick: the subject line of this patch says 'videbuf' instead of 'videobuf'.
>
> Will fix to, and next round will have the additional -EINVAL on top.
> Iirc Mauro was pretty clear that we can't just delete this, so I kinda
> don't want to get stuck in this discussion with my patches :-)
Ah, I found that discussion for the v2 of this series.
Yes, add that on top and we can discuss whether to Ack that -EINVAL patch or
not.
I don't see why we would want to continue supporting a broken model that is
also a security risk, as I understand it.
Tomasz, can you look at the discussion for this old RFC patch of mine:
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20200221084531.576156-9-hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx/
Specifically, if we just drop support for follow_pfn(), would that cause
problems for Chromium since that is apparently still using USERPTR for encoders?
Regards,
Hans
> -Daniel
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, Daniel
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Hans
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Hans
>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Cc: Pawel Osciak <pawel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> v3:
>>>>>> - Reference the commit that enabled the zerocopy userptr use case to
>>>>>> make it abundandtly clear that this patch only affects that, and not
>>>>>> normal memory userptr. The old commit message already explained that
>>>>>> normal memory userptr is unaffected, but I guess that was not clear
>>>>>> enough.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c
>>>>>> index a0e65481a201..1a82ec13ea00 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c
>>>>>> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ int get_vaddr_frames(unsigned long start, unsigned int nr_frames,
>>>>>> break;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> while (ret < nr_frames && start + PAGE_SIZE <= vma->vm_end) {
>>>>>> - err = follow_pfn(vma, start, &nums[ret]);
>>>>>> + err = unsafe_follow_pfn(vma, start, &nums[ret]);
>>>>>> if (err) {
>>>>>> if (ret == 0)
>>>>>> ret = err;
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c
>>>>>> index 52312ce2ba05..821c4a76ab96 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dma-contig.c
>>>>>> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int videobuf_dma_contig_user_get(struct videobuf_dma_contig_memory *mem,
>>>>>> user_address = untagged_baddr;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> while (pages_done < (mem->size >> PAGE_SHIFT)) {
>>>>>> - ret = follow_pfn(vma, user_address, &this_pfn);
>>>>>> + ret = unsafe_follow_pfn(vma, user_address, &this_pfn);
>>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>>> break;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
