Re: [PATCH 00/11] KVM: selftests: Cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 10:56 AM Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 10:23:46PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > This series attempts to clean up demand_paging_test and dirty_log_test
> > by factoring out common code, creating some new API along the way. It's
> > main goal is to prepare for even more factoring that Ben and Peter want
> > to do. The series would have a nice negative diff stat, but it also
> > picks up a few of Peter's patches for his new dirty log test. So, the
> > +/- diff stat is close to equal. It's not as close as an electoral vote
> > count, but it's close.
> >
> > I've tested on x86 and AArch64 (one config each), but not s390x.
>
> The whole series looks good to me (probably except the PTRS_PER_PAGE one; but
> that's not hurting much anyways, I think).  Thanks for picking up the other
> patches, even if they made the diff stat much less pretty..

This series looks good to me too. Thanks for doing this Drew!

Sorry I'm later than I wanted to be in reviewing this series. I
learned I was exposed to someone with COVID yesterday, so I've been a
bit scattered. The dirty log perf test series v3 might be delayed a
bit as a result, but I'll send it out as soon as I can after this
series is merged.

>
> --
> Peter Xu
>



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux