Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: selftests: Factor code out of demand_paging_test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 7:28 AM Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 10:00:17AM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 01:16:31PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > If you don't mind I'd like to try and cleanup / generalize / refactor
> > > demand_paging_test.c and dirty_log_test.c with a few patches first for
> > > you to base this work on. I can probably get something posted today
> > > or tomorrow.
> >
> > Drew,
> >
> > Would you consider picking up the two patches below in the dirty ring series if
> > you plan to rework the dirty log tests?  I got your r-b so I am making bold to
> > think I'm ok to ask this; I just want to avoid another potential conflict
> > within the series.
>
> Sure, no problem.
>
> I'll go ahead and get that cleanup / refactor series out.

Thanks Drew! I agree this will all be a lot cleaner when refactored
for multi-vcpu tests generally.

>
> Thanks,
> drew
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20201023183358.50607-11-peterx@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20201023183358.50607-12-peterx@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > --
> > Peter Xu
> >
>



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux