On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:41:24 +0100 Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:19:47 +0100 > Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:34:28 -0400 > > Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Combined set of patches that exploit vfio/s390-pci features available in > > > kernel 5.10-rc1. This patch set is a combination of > > > > > > [PATCH v4 0/5] s390x/pci: Accomodate vfio DMA limiting > > > > > > and > > > > > > [PATCH v3 00/10] Retrieve zPCI hardware information from VFIO > > > > > > with duplicate patches removed and a single header sync. All patches have > > > prior maintainer reviews except for: > > > > > > - Patch 1 (update-linux-headers change to add new file) > > > > That one has ;) > > > > > - Patch 2 (header sync against 5.10-rc1) > > > > I'm still unsure about the rdma/(q)atomic stuff -- had we reached any > > conclusion there? > > > > > - Patch 13 - contains a functional (debug) change; I switched from using > > > DPRINTFs to using trace events per Connie's request. > > Looks good. > > I think that should go through the vfio tree, in case there are > collisions with the migration stuff? > > (The s390x queue is currently empty.) Patches appear to apply cleanly on top of the migration series, but I can take it if preferred. Thanks, Alex
