On 24 October 2020 10:13:36 BST, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On 24/10/20 10:26, David Woodhouse wrote: >> I was also hoping Paolo was going to take the patch which just >defines >> the KVM_FEATURE_MSI_EXT_DEST_ID bit² ASAP, so that we end up with a >> second patch³ that *just* wires it up to x86_init.msi_ext_dest_id() >for >> KVM. >> >> ¹ >https://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux.git/commitdiff/734719c1f4 >> ² >https://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux.git/commitdiff/3f371d6749 >> ³ >https://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux.git/commitdiff/8399e14eb5 > >Yes, I am going to take it. > >I was already sort of playing with fire with the 5.10 pull request (and >with me being lousy in general during the 5.10 development period, to >be >honest), so I left it for rc2 or rc3. It's just docs and it happened >to >conflict with another documentation patch that had gone in through Jon >Corbet's tree. OK, thanks. I'll rework Thomas's tree with that first and the other changes I'd mentioned in my parts, as well as fixing up that unholy chimæra of struct/union in which we set some bitfields from each side of the union, test and push it out later today. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
