On 2020/10/22 上午11:54, Liu, Yi L wrote:
Hi Jason,
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 10:56 AM
[...]
If you(Intel) don't have plan to do vDPA, you should not prevent other vendors
from implementing PASID capable hardware through non-VFIO subsystem/uAPI
on top of your SIOV architecture. Isn't it?
yes, that's true.
So if Intel has the willing to collaborate on the POC, I'd happy to help. E.g it's not
hard to have a PASID capable virtio device through qemu, and we can start from
there.
actually, I'm already doing a poc to move the PASID allocation/free interface
out of VFIO. So that other users could use it as well. I think this is also
what you replied previously. :-) I'll send out when it's ready and seek for
your help on mature it. does it sound good to you?
Yes, fine with me.
Thanks
Regards,
Yi Liu
Thanks
