On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:56:51AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> There's three ways to access PCI BARs from userspace: /dev/mem, sysfs
> files, and the old proc interface. Two check against
> iomem_is_exclusive, proc never did. And with CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM,
> this starts to matter, since we don't want random userspace having
> access to PCI BARs while a driver is loaded and using it.
>
> Fix this by adding the same iomem_is_exclusive() check we already have
> on the sysfs side in pci_mmap_resource().
>
> References: 90a545e98126 ("restrict /dev/mem to idle io memory ranges")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
Maybe not for fixing in this series, but this access to
IORESOURCE_BUSY doesn't have any locking.
The write side holds the resource_lock at least..
> ret = pci_mmap_page_range(dev, i, vma,
> fpriv->mmap_state, write_combine);
At this point the vma isn't linked into the address space, so doesn't
this happen?
CPU 0 CPU1
mmap_region()
vma = vm_area_alloc
proc_bus_pci_mmap
iomem_is_exclusive
pci_mmap_page_range
revoke_devmem
unmap_mapping_range()
// vma is not linked to the address space here,
// unmap doesn't find it
vma_link()
!!! The VMA gets mapped with the revoked PTEs
I couldn't find anything that prevents it at least, no mmap_sem on the
unmap side, just the i_mmap_lock
Not seeing how address space and pre-populating during mmap work
together? Did I miss locking someplace?
Not something to be fixed for this series, this is clearly an
improvement, but seems like another problem to tackle?
Jason
