Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 14/10/2020 17.42, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Currently, we have the following check condition in x86/unittests.cfg:
>>
>> check = /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/allow_smaller_maxphyaddr=Y
>>
>> the check, however, passes successfully on AMD because the checked file
>> is just missing. This doesn't sound right, reverse the check: fail
>> if the content of the file doesn't match the expectation or if the
>> file is not there.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> scripts/runtime.bash | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/runtime.bash b/scripts/runtime.bash
>> index 3121c1ffdae8..f94c094de03b 100644
>> --- a/scripts/runtime.bash
>> +++ b/scripts/runtime.bash
>> @@ -118,7 +118,10 @@ function run()
>> for check_param in "${check[@]}"; do
>> path=${check_param%%=*}
>> value=${check_param#*=}
>> - if [ -f "$path" ] && [ "$(cat $path)" != "$value" ]; then
>> + if [ -z "$path" ]; then
>> + continue
>> + fi
>
> That runtime.bash script seems to use spaces for indentation, not tabs ...
> so could you please use spaces for your patch, too?
>
Yea, trusted my editior to do the right thing and it let me down... v2
is coming!
--
Vitaly
