Re: Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks!
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Subject
: Re: Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks!
From
: harry harry <hiharryharryharry@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 23:45:02 -0400
Cc
: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>, qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, mathieu.tarral@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx, libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
a4f3816dab09f4e28e33c66b8ff8273147415567.camel@redhat.com
>
References
: <
CA+-xGqMd4_58_+QKetjOsubBqrDnaYF+YWE3TC3kEcNGxPiPfg@mail.gmail.com
> <
47ead258320536d00f9f32891da3810040875aff.camel@redhat.com
> <CA+-xGqOm2sWbxR=3W1pWrZNLOt7EE5qiNWxMz=9=gmga15vD2w@mail.gmail.com> <
20201012165428.GD26135@linux.intel.com
> <CA+-xGqPkkiws0bxrzud_qKs3ZmKN9=AfN=JGephfGc+2rn6ybw@mail.gmail.com> <
20201013045245.GA11344@linux.intel.com
> <CA+-xGqO4DtUs3-jH+QMPEze2GrXwtNX0z=vVUVak5HOpPKaDxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+-xGqMMa-DB1SND5MRugusDafjNA9CVw-=OBK7q=CK1impmTQ@mail.gmail.com> <
a163c2d8-d8a1-dc03-6230-a2e104e3b039@redhat.com
> <
CA+-xGqOMKRh+_5vYXeLOiGnTMw4L_gUccqdQ+HGSOzuTosp6tw@mail.gmail.com
> <
a4f3816dab09f4e28e33c66b8ff8273147415567.camel@redhat.com
>
Hi Maxim, Thanks for your emphasis. It's much clearer. Best, Harry
References
:
Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks!
From:
harry harry
Re: Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks!
From:
Maxim Levitsky
Re: Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks!
From:
harry harry
Re: Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks!
From:
Sean Christopherson
Re: Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks!
From:
harry harry
Re: Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks!
From:
Sean Christopherson
Re: Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks!
From:
Paolo Bonzini
Re: Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks!
From:
harry harry
Re: Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks!
From:
Maxim Levitsky
Prev by Date:
Re: Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks!
Next by Date:
Re: (proposal) RE: [PATCH v7 00/16] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs
Previous by thread:
Re: Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks!
Next by thread:
Re: Why guest physical addresses are not the same as the corresponding host virtual addresses in QEMU/KVM? Thanks!
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[KVM ARM]
[KVM ia64]
[KVM ppc]
[Virtualization Tools]
[Spice Development]
[Libvirt]
[Libvirt Users]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Questions]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]