On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 10:00:58 +0800
Tian Tao <tiantao6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It is redundant to do irqsave and irqrestore in hardIRQ context.
But this function is also called from non-IRQ context. Thanks,
Alex
> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
> index c5b09ec..24fd6c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
> @@ -139,10 +139,9 @@ static int vfio_platform_set_irq_unmask(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> static irqreturn_t vfio_automasked_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> struct vfio_platform_irq *irq_ctx = dev_id;
> - unsigned long flags;
> int ret = IRQ_NONE;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_ctx->lock, flags);
> + spin_lock(&irq_ctx->lock);
>
> if (!irq_ctx->masked) {
> ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> @@ -152,7 +151,7 @@ static irqreturn_t vfio_automasked_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> irq_ctx->masked = true;
> }
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_ctx->lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock(&irq_ctx->lock);
>
> if (ret == IRQ_HANDLED)
> eventfd_signal(irq_ctx->trigger, 1);
