On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 10:51 AM Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On successful nested VM-Enter, check for pending interrupts and convert > the highest priority interrupt to a pending posted interrupt if it > matches L2's notification vector. If the vCPU receives a notification > interrupt before nested VM-Enter (assuming L1 disables IRQs before doing > VM-Enter), the pending interrupt (for L1) should be recognized and > processed as a posted interrupt when interrupts become unblocked after > VM-Enter to L2. > > This fixes a bug where L1/L2 will get stuck in an infinite loop if L1 is > trying to inject an interrupt into L2 by setting the appropriate bit in > L2's PIR and sending a self-IPI prior to VM-Enter (as opposed to KVM's > method of manually moving the vector from PIR->vIRR/RVI). KVM will > observe the IPI while the vCPU is in L1 context and so won't immediately > morph it to a posted interrupt for L2. The pending interrupt will be > seen by vmx_check_nested_events(), cause KVM to force an immediate exit > after nested VM-Enter, and eventually be reflected to L1 as a VM-Exit. > After handling the VM-Exit, L1 will see that L2 has a pending interrupt > in PIR, send another IPI, and repeat until L2 is killed. > > Note, posted interrupts require virtual interrupt deliveriy, and virtual > interrupt delivery requires exit-on-interrupt, ergo interrupts will be > unconditionally unmasked on VM-Enter if posted interrupts are enabled. > > Fixes: 705699a13994 ("KVM: nVMX: Enable nested posted interrupt processing") > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> > --- I don't think this is the best fix. I believe the real problem is the way that external and posted interrupts are handled in vmx_check_nested_events(). First of all, I believe that the existing call to vmx_complete_nested_posted_interrupt() at the end of vmx_check_nested_events() is far too aggressive. Unless I am missing something in the SDM, posted interrupt processing is *only* triggered when the notification vector is received in VMX non-root mode. It is not triggered on VM-entry. Looking back one block, we have: if (kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu) && !vmx_interrupt_blocked(vcpu)) { if (block_nested_events) return -EBUSY; if (!nested_exit_on_intr(vcpu)) goto no_vmexit; nested_vmx_vmexit(vcpu, EXIT_REASON_EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT, 0, 0); return 0; } If nested_exit_on_intr() is true, we should first check to see if "acknowledge interrupt on exit" is set. If so, we should acknowledge the interrupt right here, with a call to kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(), rather than deep in the guts of nested_vmx_vmexit(). If the vector we get is the notification vector from VMCS12, then we should call vmx_complete_nested_posted_interrupt(). Otherwise, we should call nested_vmx_vmexit(EXIT_REASON_EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT) as we do now. Furthermore, vmx_complete_nested_posted_interrupt() should write to the L1 EOI register, as indicated in step 4 of the 7-step sequence detailed in section 29.6 of the SDM, volume 3. It skips this step today.