On 2020/9/30 上午12:30, Greg Kurz wrote:
When the IOTLB device is enabled, the vring addresses we get
from userspace are GIOVAs. It is thus wrong to pass them down
to access_ok() which only takes HVAs.
Access validation is done at prefetch time with IOTLB. Teach
vq_access_ok() about that by moving the (vq->iotlb) check
from vhost_vq_access_ok() to vq_access_ok(). This prevents
vhost_vring_set_addr() to fail when verifying the accesses.
No behavior change for vhost_vq_access_ok().
BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883084
Fixes: 6b1e6cc7855b ("vhost: new device IOTLB API")
Cc: jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index b45519ca66a7..c3b49975dc28 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -1290,6 +1290,11 @@ static bool vq_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int num,
vring_used_t __user *used)
{
+ /* If an IOTLB device is present, the vring addresses are
+ * GIOVAs. Access validation occurs at prefetch time. */
+ if (vq->iotlb)
+ return true;
+
return access_ok(desc, vhost_get_desc_size(vq, num)) &&
access_ok(avail, vhost_get_avail_size(vq, num)) &&
access_ok(used, vhost_get_used_size(vq, num));
@@ -1383,10 +1388,6 @@ bool vhost_vq_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
if (!vq_log_access_ok(vq, vq->log_base))
return false;
- /* Access validation occurs at prefetch time with IOTLB */
- if (vq->iotlb)
- return true;
-
return vq_access_ok(vq, vq->num, vq->desc, vq->avail, vq->used);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_vq_access_ok);
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks
