Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: nSVM: Add check for CR3 and CR4 reserved bits to svm_set_nested_state()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 9/23/20 8:53 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 29/08/20 02:48, Krish Sadhukhan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
index fb68467e6049..7a51ce465f3e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
@@ -215,9 +215,35 @@ static bool nested_vmcb_check_controls(struct vmcb_control_area *control)
  	return true;
  }
+static bool nested_vmcb_check_cr3_cr4(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
+				      struct vmcb_save_area *save)
+{
+	bool nested_vmcb_lma =
+	        (save->efer & EFER_LME) &&
+		(save->cr0 & X86_CR0_PG);
+
+	if (!nested_vmcb_lma) {
+		if (save->cr4 & X86_CR4_PAE) {
+			if (save->cr3 & MSR_CR3_LEGACY_PAE_RESERVED_MASK)
+				return false;
+		} else {
+			if (save->cr3 & MSR_CR3_LEGACY_RESERVED_MASK)
+				return false;
+		}
+	} else {
+		if (!(save->cr4 & X86_CR4_PAE) ||
+		    !(save->cr0 & X86_CR0_PE) ||
+		    (save->cr3 & MSR_CR3_LONG_MBZ_MASK))
+			return false;
+	}
+	if (kvm_valid_cr4(&svm->vcpu, save->cr4))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
  static bool nested_vmcb_checks(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct vmcb *vmcb)
  {
-	bool nested_vmcb_lma;
  	if ((vmcb->save.efer & EFER_SVME) == 0)
  		return false;
@@ -228,25 +254,7 @@ static bool nested_vmcb_checks(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct vmcb *vmcb)
  	if (!kvm_dr6_valid(vmcb->save.dr6) || !kvm_dr7_valid(vmcb->save.dr7))
  		return false;
- nested_vmcb_lma =
-	        (vmcb->save.efer & EFER_LME) &&
-		(vmcb->save.cr0 & X86_CR0_PG);
-
-	if (!nested_vmcb_lma) {
-		if (vmcb->save.cr4 & X86_CR4_PAE) {
-			if (vmcb->save.cr3 & MSR_CR3_LEGACY_PAE_RESERVED_MASK)
-				return false;
-		} else {
-			if (vmcb->save.cr3 & MSR_CR3_LEGACY_RESERVED_MASK)
-				return false;
-		}
-	} else {
-		if (!(vmcb->save.cr4 & X86_CR4_PAE) ||
-		    !(vmcb->save.cr0 & X86_CR0_PE) ||
-		    (vmcb->save.cr3 & MSR_CR3_LONG_RESERVED_MASK))
-			return false;
-	}
-	if (kvm_valid_cr4(&svm->vcpu, vmcb->save.cr4))
+	if (!nested_vmcb_check_cr3_cr4(svm, &(vmcb->save)))
  		return false;
return nested_vmcb_check_controls(&vmcb->control);
@@ -1114,9 +1122,8 @@ static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  	/*
  	 * Validate host state saved from before VMRUN (see
  	 * nested_svm_check_permissions).
-	 * TODO: validate reserved bits for all saved state.
  	 */
-	if (!(save.cr0 & X86_CR0_PG))
+	if (!nested_vmcb_check_cr3_cr4(svm, &save))
  		return -EINVAL;
Removing the "if" is incorrect.
Sorry, my mistake.
  Also are there really no more reserved
bits to check?
I have sent v2 which has added checks for DR6, DR7 and EFER.

Paolo




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux