Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Qemu SEV-ES guest support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/25/20 2:03 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
> 
> This patch series provides support for launching an SEV-ES guest.
> 
> Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State (SEV-ES) expands on the
> SEV support to protect the guest register state from the hypervisor. See
> "AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System Programming",
> section "15.35 Encrypted State (SEV-ES)" [1].
> 
> In order to allow a hypervisor to perform functions on behalf of a guest,
> there is architectural support for notifying a guest's operating system
> when certain types of VMEXITs are about to occur. This allows the guest to
> selectively share information with the hypervisor to satisfy the requested
> function. The notification is performed using a new exception, the VMM
> Communication exception (#VC). The information is shared through the
> Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block (GHCB) using the VMGEXIT instruction.
> The GHCB format and the protocol for using it is documented in "SEV-ES
> Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block Standardization" [2].
> 
> The main areas of the Qemu code that are updated to support SEV-ES are
> around the SEV guest launch process and AP booting in order to support
> booting multiple vCPUs.
> 
> There are no new command line switches required. Instead, the desire for
> SEV-ES is presented using the SEV policy object. Bit 2 of the SEV policy
> object indicates that SEV-ES is required.
> 
> The SEV launch process is updated in two ways. The first is that a the
> KVM_SEV_ES_INIT ioctl is used to initialize the guest instead of the
> standard KVM_SEV_INIT ioctl. The second is that before the SEV launch
> measurement is calculated, the LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA SEV API is invoked for
> each vCPU that Qemu has created. Once the LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA API has been
> invoked, no direct changes to the guest register state can be made.
> 
> AP booting poses some interesting challenges. The INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence
> is typically used to boot the APs. However, the hypervisor is not allowed
> to update the guest registers. For the APs, the reset vector must be known
> in advance. An OVMF method to provide a known reset vector address exists
> by providing an SEV information block, identified by UUID, near the end of
> the firmware [3]. OVMF will program the jump to the actual reset vector in
> this area of memory. Since the memory location is known in advance, an AP
> can be created with the known reset vector address as its starting CS:IP.
> The GHCB document [2] talks about how SMP booting under SEV-ES is
> performed. SEV-ES also requires the use of the in-kernel irqchip support
> in order to minimize the changes required to Qemu to support AP booting.
> 
> [1] https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/24593.pdf
> [2] https://developer.amd.com/wp-content/resources/56421.pdf
> [3] 30937f2f98c4 ("OvmfPkg: Use the SEV-ES work area for the SEV-ES AP reset vector")
>      https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/30937f2f98c42496f2f143fe8374ae7f7e684847
> 
> ---
> 
> These patches are based on commit:
> d0ed6a69d3 ("Update version for v5.1.0 release")
> 
> (I tried basing on the latest Qemu commit, but I was having build issues
> that level)

Sorry, forgot to update this part...

These patches are based on commit:
1bd5556f66 ("Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/kraxel/tags/audio-20200923-pull-request' into staging")

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> A version of the tree can be found at:
> https://github.com/AMDESE/qemu/tree/sev-es-v12
> 
> Changes since v3:
> - Use the QemuUUID structure for GUID definitions
> - Use SEV-ES policy bit definition from target/i386/sev_i386.h
> - Update SMM support to a per-VM check in order to check SMM capability
>    at the VM level since SEV-ES guests don't currently support SMM
> - Make the CPU resettable check an arch-specific check
> 
> Changes since v2:
> - Add in-kernel irqchip requirement for SEV-ES guests
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Fixed checkpatch.pl errors/warnings
> 
> Tom Lendacky (6):
>    sev/i386: Add initial support for SEV-ES
>    sev/i386: Require in-kernel irqchip support for SEV-ES guests
>    sev/i386: Allow AP booting under SEV-ES
>    sev/i386: Don't allow a system reset under an SEV-ES guest
>    kvm/i386: Use a per-VM check for SMM capability
>    sev/i386: Enable an SEV-ES guest based on SEV policy
> 
>   accel/kvm/kvm-all.c       |  69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c    |   5 ++
>   hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c        |  10 +++-
>   include/sysemu/cpus.h     |   2 +
>   include/sysemu/hw_accel.h |   5 ++
>   include/sysemu/kvm.h      |  26 +++++++++
>   include/sysemu/sev.h      |   3 ++
>   softmmu/cpus.c            |   5 ++
>   softmmu/vl.c              |   5 +-
>   target/arm/kvm.c          |   5 ++
>   target/i386/cpu.c         |   1 +
>   target/i386/kvm.c         |  10 +++-
>   target/i386/sev-stub.c    |   5 ++
>   target/i386/sev.c         | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   target/i386/sev_i386.h    |   1 +
>   target/mips/kvm.c         |   5 ++
>   target/ppc/kvm.c          |   5 ++
>   target/s390x/kvm.c        |   5 ++
>   18 files changed, 271 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux