On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:58:58PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote: > counting of rmap entries was missed when desc->sptes is full > and desc->more is NULL > > and merging two PTE_LIST_EXT-1 check as one, to avoids the > extra comparison to give slightly optimization Please write complete sentences, and use proper capitalization and punctuation. It's not a big deal for short changelogs, but it's crucial for readability of larger changelogs. E.g. Fix an off-by-one style bug in pte_list_add() where it failed to account the last full set of SPTEs, i.e. when desc->sptes is full and desc->more is NULL. Merge the two "PTE_LIST_EXT-1" checks as part of the fix to avoid an extra comparison. > Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> No need to give me credit, I just nitpicked the code, identifying the bug and the fix was all you. :-) Thanks for the fix! > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx> Paolo, Although it's a bug fix, I don't think this needs a Fixes / Cc:stable. The bug only results in rmap recycling being delayed by one rmap. Stable kernels can probably live with an off-by-one bug given that RMAP_RECYCLE_THRESHOLD is completely arbitrary. :-) Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > diff with v1: merge two check as one > > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 12 +++++++----- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > index a5d0207e7189..c4068be6bb3f 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > @@ -1273,12 +1273,14 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte, > } else { > rmap_printk("pte_list_add: %p %llx many->many\n", spte, *spte); > desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)(rmap_head->val & ~1ul); > - while (desc->sptes[PTE_LIST_EXT-1] && desc->more) { > - desc = desc->more; > + while (desc->sptes[PTE_LIST_EXT-1]) { > count += PTE_LIST_EXT; > - } > - if (desc->sptes[PTE_LIST_EXT-1]) { > - desc->more = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu); > + > + if (!desc->more) { > + desc->more = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu); > + desc = desc->more; > + break; > + } > desc = desc->more; > } > for (i = 0; desc->sptes[i]; ++i) > -- > 2.16.2 >