On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 11:34:29 -0400
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> We use a S390PCIGroup structure to hold the information related to a
> zPCI Function group.
>
> This allows us to be ready to support multiple groups and to retrieve
> the group information from the host.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 10 ++++++++++
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> index 92146a2..3015d86 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> @@ -737,6 +737,46 @@ static void s390_pci_iommu_free(S390pciState *s, PCIBus *bus, int32_t devfn)
> object_unref(OBJECT(iommu));
> }
>
> +static S390PCIGroup *s390_grp_create(int ug)
I think you made the identifiers a bit too compact :)
s390_group_create() is not that long, and I have no idea what the 'ug'
(ugh :) parameter is supposed to mean.
> +{
> + S390PCIGroup *grp;
group?
> + S390pciState *s = s390_get_phb();
> +
> + grp = g_new0(S390PCIGroup, 1);
> + grp->ug = ug;
> + QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&s->zpci_grps, grp, link);
zpci_groups? I think you get the idea :)
> + return grp;
> +}
(...)
No objection to the patch in general.
