Hi, Avi, On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 17:35 +0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > (also, I if we can't handle guest-mode SIGBUS I think it would be nice > > > to raise it again so the process terminates due to the SIGBUS). > > > > For SIGBUS we can not relay to guest as MCE, we can either abort or > > reset SIGBUS to SIGDFL and re-raise it. Both are OK for me. You prefer > > the latter one? > > I think a suitable error message and exit would be better than a plain > signal kill. It shouldn't look like qemu crashed due to a software > bug. Ideally a error message in a way that it can be parsed by libvirt etc. > and reported in a suitable way. Do you agree with us about SIGBUS processing? Best Regards, Huang Ying -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
