On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:29:26PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote:
> counting of rmap entries was missed when desc->sptes is full
> and desc->more is NULL
>
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index a5d0207e7189..8ffa4e40b650 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -1280,6 +1280,7 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
> if (desc->sptes[PTE_LIST_EXT-1]) {
> desc->more = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu);
> desc = desc->more;
> + count += PTE_LIST_EXT;
Kind of a nit, but what do you think about merging the two PTE_LIST_EXT-1
check? For me, that makes the resulting code more obviously correct, and it
might be slightly more performant as it avoids the extra comparison, though
the compiler may be smart enough to optimize that away without help.
while (desc->sptes[PTE_LIST_EXIT-1]) {
count += PTE_LIST_EXT;
if (!desc->more) {
desc->more = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu);
desc = desc->more;
break;
}
desc = desc->more;
}
> }
> for (i = 0; desc->sptes[i]; ++i)
> ++count;
> --
> 2.16.2
>
