Re: [PATCH 0/6] misc: Some inclusive terminology changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 10/09/2020 à 09:01, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit :
> We don't have (yet?) inclusive terminology guidelines,
> but the PCI hole memory is not "black", the DMA sources
> don't stream to "slaves", and there isn't really a TSX
> "black" list, we only check for broken fields.
> 
> As this terms can be considered offensive, and changing
> them is a no-brain operation, simply do it.
> 

These changes are technically trivial but they are not from an ethical
point of view. I will add to the trivial branch only if they are acked
by their own maintainers.

Moreover, I think we should have a project level guideline before doing
that to be sure everyone agrees.

Thanks,
Laurent



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux