The PMU emulation error handling is pretty messy when dealing with
attributes. Let's refactor it so that we have less duplication,
and that it is easy to extend later on.
A functional change is that kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init() used to return
-ENXIO when the PMU feature wasn't set. The error is now reported
as -ENODEV, matching the documentation. -ENXIO is still returned
when the interrupt isn't properly configured.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 21 +++++++++------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
index f0d0312c0a55..93d797df42c6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
@@ -735,15 +735,6 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
- return -ENODEV;
-
- if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
- return -ENXIO;
-
- if (vcpu->arch.pmu.created)
- return -EBUSY;
-
if (irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)) {
int ret;
@@ -796,6 +787,15 @@ static bool pmu_irq_is_valid(struct kvm *kvm, int irq)
int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
{
+ if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ if (vcpu->arch.pmu.created)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
switch (attr->attr) {
case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ: {
int __user *uaddr = (int __user *)(long)attr->addr;
@@ -804,9 +804,6 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
if (!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm))
return -EINVAL;
- if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
- return -ENODEV;
-
if (get_user(irq, uaddr))
return -EFAULT;
--
2.28.0
