Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 00:39:51 +0200
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx, frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mst@xxxxxxxxxx, jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx, cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx, hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1599471547-28631-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
References: <1599471547-28631-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon,  7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
> to validate VIRTIO device features.

Michael, is this going in via your tree?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
  - From: Michael S. Tsirkin
- Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
  - From: Cornelia Huck

References:
- [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
  - From: Pierre Morel

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
Next by Date: [Bug 209155] KVM Linux guest with more than 1 CPU panics after commit 404d5d7bff0d419fe11c7eaebca9ec8f25258f95 on old CPU (Phenom x4)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] virtio: let arch advertise guest's memory access restrictions
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]