Re: [RFC 2/4] kvm: arm64: emulate the ID registers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/13/2020 5:05 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 02:05:15PM +0800, Peng Liang wrote:
>> To emulate the ID registers, we need a place to storage the values of
>> the ID regsiters.  Maybe putting in kvm_arch_vcpu is a good idea.
>>
>> This commit has no functional changes but only code refactor.  When
>> initializing a vcpu, get the values of the ID registers from
>> arm64_ftr_regs and storage them in kvm_arch_vcpu.  And we just read
>> the value from kvm_arch_vcpu when getting/setting the value of the ID
>> regs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Liang <liangpeng10@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 ++
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  include/uapi/linux/kvm.h          | 11 +++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index f81151ad3d3c..7f7bd36702f7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -336,6 +336,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>>  		u64 last_steal;
>>  		gpa_t base;
>>  	} steal;
>> +
>> +	struct id_registers idregs;
>>  };
>>  
>>  /* Pointer to the vcpu's SVE FFR for sve_{save,load}_state() */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> index 73e12869afe3..18ebbe1c64ee 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> @@ -262,6 +262,24 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_precreate(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int get_cpu_ftr(u32 id, u64 val, void *argp)
>> +{
>> +	struct id_registers *idregs = argp;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * (Op0, Op1, CRn, CRm, Op2) of ID registers is (3, 0, 0, crm, op2),
>> +	 * where 1<=crm<8, 0<=op2<8.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (sys_reg_Op0(id) == 3 && sys_reg_Op1(id) == 0 &&
>> +	    sys_reg_CRn(id) == 0 && sys_reg_CRm(id) > 0) {
>> +		idregs->regs[idregs->num].sys_id = id;
>> +		idregs->regs[idregs->num].sys_val = val;
>> +		idregs->num++;
> 
> This num++ means we should ensure get_cpu_ftr() is only used once per
> VCPU, but we don't need 'num'. The index can be derived: (crm<<3)|op2
> 
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  {
>>  	int err;
>> @@ -285,6 +303,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  	if (err)
>>  		return err;
>>  
>> +	arm64_cpu_ftr_regs_traverse(get_cpu_ftr, &vcpu->arch.idregs);
>> +
>>  	return create_hyp_mappings(vcpu, vcpu + 1, PAGE_HYP);
>>  }
>>  
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> index 138961d7ebe3..776c2757a01e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> @@ -1092,13 +1092,32 @@ static bool access_arch_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  	return true;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static struct id_reg_info *kvm_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < vcpu->arch.idregs.num; ++i) {
>> +		if (vcpu->arch.idregs.regs[i].sys_id == id)
>> +			return &vcpu->arch.idregs.regs[i];
> 
> With a derived index we don't need to search. Just do
> 
>  if (sys_reg_Op0(id) != 3 || sys_reg_Op1(id) != 0 ||
>      sys_reg_CRn(id) != 0 || sys_reg_CRm(id) == 0)
>       return NULL;
> 
>  return &vcpu->arch.idregs.regs[(sys_reg_CRm(id)<<3) | sys_reg_Op2(id)]; 
>  
> 

Thank you for your suggestions.

>> +	}
>> +	return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u64 kvm_get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id)
>> +{
>> +	struct id_reg_info *ri = kvm_id_reg(vcpu, id);
>> +
>> +	BUG_ON(!ri);
>> +	return ri->sys_val;
>> +}
>> +
>>  /* Read a sanitised cpufeature ID register by sys_reg_desc */
>> -static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +static u64 read_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  		struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
>>  {
>>  	u32 id = sys_reg((u32)r->Op0, (u32)r->Op1,
>>  			 (u32)r->CRn, (u32)r->CRm, (u32)r->Op2);
>> -	u64 val = raz ? 0 : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
>> +	u64 val = raz ? 0 : kvm_get_id_reg(vcpu, id);
>>  
>>  	if (id == SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1) {
>>  		if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
>> @@ -1238,7 +1257,7 @@ static int set_id_aa64zfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>   * are stored, and for set_id_reg() we don't allow the effective value
>>   * to be changed.
>>   */
>> -static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +static int __get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  			const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
>>  			bool raz)
>>  {
>> @@ -1248,7 +1267,7 @@ static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  	return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, id);
>>  }
>>  
>> -static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +static int __set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  			const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
>>  			bool raz)
>>  {
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> index f6d86033c4fa..1029444d04aa 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> @@ -1272,6 +1272,17 @@ struct kvm_vfio_spapr_tce {
>>  	__s32	tablefd;
>>  };
>>  
>> +#define ID_REG_MAX_NUMS 64
>> +struct id_reg_info {
>> +	uint64_t sys_id;
>> +	uint64_t sys_val;
> 
> I'm not sure the 'sys_' prefix is necessary.
> 
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct id_registers {
>> +	struct id_reg_info regs[ID_REG_MAX_NUMS];
>> +	uint64_t num;
>> +};
>> +
> 
> This is arch specific, so there should be ARMv8 in the names.

Some names are not very suitable, I'll change them.

> 
>>  /*
>>   * ioctls for VM fds
>>   */
>> -- 
>> 2.18.4
>>
> 
> .
> 




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux