Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 03/09/2009 16:39:09: > From: > > Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: > > Orit Wasserman/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL > > Cc: > > Abel Gordon/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx, Ben-Ami Yassour1/ > Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mmday@xxxxxxxxxx, Muli Ben- > Yehuda/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL > > Date: > > 03/09/2009 16:39 > > Subject: > > Re: [PATCH 1/6] Nested VMX patch 1 implements vmon and vmoff > > On 09/03/2009 03:34 PM, Orit Wasserman wrote: > > > >> I think we need to mask it with the capabilities we support. Otherwise > >> the guest can try to use some new feature which we don't support yet, > >> and crash. > >> > > I agree , but I went over the Intel spec and didn't find any problematic > > feature. > > We may need to consider it in the future. > > > > We need to do it, since we don't know anything about future processors. OK > > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
