On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 4:08 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Like the syscall entry/exit code interrupt/exception entry after the real > low level ASM bits should not be different accross architectures. > > Provide a generic version based on the x86 code. I don't like the name. Sure, idtentry is ugly and x86-specific, but irq gives the wrong impression. This is an entry path suitable for any entry that is guaranteed not to hit during entry/exit handling. Syscalls, page faults, etc are not "irqs".
