On 7/24/20 4:38 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 2020-07-20 17:03, Tony Krowiak wrote:
This patch refactor's the vfio_ap device driver to use the AP bus's
ap_get_qdev() function to retrieve the vfio_ap_queue struct containing
information about a queue that is bound to the vfio_ap device driver.
The bus's ap_get_qdev() function retrieves the queue device from a
hashtable keyed by APQN. This is much more efficient than looping over
the list of devices attached to the AP bus by several orders of
magnitude.
The patch does much more than modifying this line. ;)
Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c | 27 ++-------
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 86 +++++++++++++++------------
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 8 ++-
3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
index f4ceb380dd61..24cdef60039a 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
@@ -53,15 +53,9 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(vfio_ap, ap_queue_ids);
*/
static int vfio_ap_queue_dev_probe(struct ap_device *apdev)
{
- struct vfio_ap_queue *q;
-
- q = kzalloc(sizeof(*q), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!q)
- return -ENOMEM;
- dev_set_drvdata(&apdev->device, q);
- q->apqn = to_ap_queue(&apdev->device)->qid;
- q->saved_isc = VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID;
- return 0;
+ struct ap_queue *queue = to_ap_queue(&apdev->device);
+
+ return vfio_ap_mdev_probe_queue(queue);
}
You should explain the reason why this function is modified.
/**
@@ -72,18 +66,9 @@ static int vfio_ap_queue_dev_probe(struct
ap_device *apdev)
*/
static void vfio_ap_queue_dev_remove(struct ap_device *apdev)
{
- struct vfio_ap_queue *q;
- int apid, apqi;
-
- mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
- q = dev_get_drvdata(&apdev->device);
- dev_set_drvdata(&apdev->device, NULL);
- apid = AP_QID_CARD(q->apqn);
- apqi = AP_QID_QUEUE(q->apqn);
- vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(apid, apqi, 1);
- vfio_ap_irq_disable(q);
- kfree(q);
- mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+ struct ap_queue *queue = to_ap_queue(&apdev->device);
+
+ vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue(queue);
}
... and this one?
static void vfio_ap_matrix_dev_release(struct device *dev)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
index e0bde8518745..ad3925f04f61 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
@@ -26,43 +26,26 @@
static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(struct mdev_device *mdev);
-static int match_apqn(struct device *dev, const void *data)
-{
- struct vfio_ap_queue *q = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-
- return (q->apqn == *(int *)(data)) ? 1 : 0;
-}
-
/**
- * vfio_ap_get_queue: Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN from a list
- * @matrix_mdev: the associated mediated matrix
+ * vfio_ap_get_queue: Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN.
* @apqn: The queue APQN
*
- * Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN from the list of the
- * devices of the vfio_ap_drv.
- * Verify that the APID and the APQI are set in the matrix.
+ * Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN from the AP queue devices
attached to
+ * the AP bus.
*
- * Returns the pointer to the associated vfio_ap_queue
+ * Returns the pointer to the vfio_ap_queue with the specified APQN,
or NULL.
*/
-static struct vfio_ap_queue *vfio_ap_get_queue(
- struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
- int apqn)
+static struct vfio_ap_queue *vfio_ap_get_queue(unsigned long apqn)
{
+ struct ap_queue *queue;
struct vfio_ap_queue *q;
- struct device *dev;
- if (!test_bit_inv(AP_QID_CARD(apqn), matrix_mdev->matrix.apm))
- return NULL;
- if (!test_bit_inv(AP_QID_QUEUE(apqn), matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm))
+ queue = ap_get_qdev(apqn);
+ if (!queue)
return NULL;
- dev = driver_find_device(&matrix_dev->vfio_ap_drv->driver, NULL,
- &apqn, match_apqn);
- if (!dev)
- return NULL;
- q = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- q->matrix_mdev = matrix_mdev;
- put_device(dev);
+ q = dev_get_drvdata(&queue->ap_dev.device);
+ put_device(&queue->ap_dev.device);
return q;
}
this function changed a lot too, you should explain the goal in the
patch comment.
This is precisely what the current patch comment describes.
...snip...
Regards,
Pierre
