Re: [PATCHv3] VMX: Enhance invalid guest state emulation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Marcelo Tosatti<mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 02:14:17PM +0200, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Marcelo Tosatti<mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 12:48:18PM +0200, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
>> >> - Change returned handle_invalid_guest_state() to return relevant exit codes
>> >> - Move triggering the emulation from vmx_vcpu_run() to vmx_handle_exit()
>> >> - Return to userspace instead of repeatedly trying to emulate instructions that have already failed
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal <m.gamal005@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > Mohammed,
>> >
>> > The handle_invalid_guest_state loop is potentially problematic. It would
>> > be more appropriate to use the __vcpu_run loop.
>> >
>> > Can't you set vmx->emulation_required depending on the result
>> > of one call to emulate_instruction and get rid of the while
>> > (!guest_state_valid(vcpu)) loop?
>> >
>>
>> Invalid state emulation is VMX-specfic, while the __vcpu_run loop is
>> independent of the virtualization extension (defined in x86.c), no?
>> AMD SVM can comforably run hosts in big-real mode and thus it doesn't
>> have the notion of a guest going to an invalid state because of mode
>> switching, so I don't think it'd be a good idea to move emulation into
>> a generic layer. Please correct me if I am wrong
>
> Right. But all i am asking is to emulate one instruction at a
> time in handle_invalid_guest_state, instead of looping until
> guest_state_valid(vcpu).
>
> So you get rid of schedule(), the check for signal_pending, etc.

But we'll still need to enter the guest when it's in a valid state, so
we need to move that loop somewhere, and now that we still have a loop
we'll also still need to do the pending signals and scheduling checks,
no?

I'd appreciate any suggestions you have to alleviate this.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux