Re: [PATCH][RESEND] x86 emulator: Add pusha and popa instructions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Marcelo Tosatti<mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 03:26:30AM +0200, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
>> This adds pusha and popa instructions (opcodes 0x60-0x61), this enables booting
>> MINIX with invalid guest state emulation on.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal <m.gamal005@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c |   52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>> index db0820d..9be2e6e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>> @@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ static u32 opcode_table[256] = {
>>       DstReg | Stack, DstReg | Stack, DstReg | Stack, DstReg | Stack,
>>       DstReg | Stack, DstReg | Stack, DstReg | Stack, DstReg | Stack,
>>       /* 0x60 - 0x67 */
>> -     0, 0, 0, DstReg | SrcMem32 | ModRM | Mov /* movsxd (x86/64) */ ,
>> +     ImplicitOps | Stack | No64, ImplicitOps | Stack | No64,
>> +     0, DstReg | SrcMem32 | ModRM | Mov /* movsxd (x86/64) */ ,
>>       0, 0, 0, 0,
>>       /* 0x68 - 0x6F */
>>       SrcImm | Mov | Stack, 0, SrcImmByte | Mov | Stack, 0,
>> @@ -1225,6 +1226,47 @@ static int emulate_pop_sreg(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>>       return rc;
>>  }
>>
>> +static void emulate_pusha(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>> +{
>> +     struct decode_cache *c = &ctxt->decode;
>> +     unsigned long old_esp = c->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP];
>> +     int reg = VCPU_REGS_RAX;
>> +
>> +     while (reg <= VCPU_REGS_RDI) {
>> +             (reg == VCPU_REGS_RSP) ?
>> +             (c->src.val = old_esp) : (c->src.val = c->regs[reg]);
>> +
>> +             emulate_push(ctxt);
>> +             ++reg;
>> +     }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int emulate_popa(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>> +                     struct x86_emulate_ops *ops)
>> +{
>> +     struct decode_cache *c = &ctxt->decode;
>> +     unsigned long old_esp = c->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP];
>> +     int rc = 0;
>> +     int reg = VCPU_REGS_RDI;
>> +
>> +     while (reg >= VCPU_REGS_RAX) {
>> +             if (reg == VCPU_REGS_RSP) {
>> +                     register_address_increment(c, &c->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP],
>> +                                                     c->op_bytes);
>> +                     --reg;
>> +             }
>> +
>> +             rc = emulate_pop(ctxt, ops, &c->regs[reg], c->op_bytes);
>> +             if (rc != 0) {
>> +                     c->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP] = old_esp;
>
> Why is it necessary to restore the local VCPU_REGS_RSP copy on failure?

Right. Perhaps this is a little too paranoid since we'll fail anyway
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux