Re: [PATCH v4 51/75] x86/sev-es: Handle MMIO events

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Jul 22, 2020, at 1:05 AM, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hmm, I have a theory ...
> 
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:01:44PM +0000, Mike Stunes wrote:
>> If I remove the call to probe_roms from setup_arch, or remove the calls to romchecksum from probe_roms, this kernel boots normally.
>> 
>> Please let me know of other tests I should run or data that I can collect. Thanks!
> 
> ... can you please try the attached diff?
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c
> index 251d0aabc55a..e1fea7a38019 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c
> @@ -389,7 +389,8 @@ static bool vc_slow_virt_to_phys(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt,
> 	pgd_t *pgd;
> 	pte_t *pte;
> 
> -	pgd = pgd_offset(current->active_mm, va);
> +	pgd = __va(read_cr3_pa());
> +	pgd = &pgd[pgd_index(va)];
> 	pte = lookup_address_in_pgd(pgd, va, &level);
> 	if (!pte) {
> 		ctxt->fi.vector     = X86_TRAP_PF;

Thanks Joerg! With that change in place, this kernel boots normally. What was the problem?





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux