> On Jul 22, 2020, at 1:05 AM, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hmm, I have a theory ... > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:01:44PM +0000, Mike Stunes wrote: >> If I remove the call to probe_roms from setup_arch, or remove the calls to romchecksum from probe_roms, this kernel boots normally. >> >> Please let me know of other tests I should run or data that I can collect. Thanks! > > ... can you please try the attached diff? > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c > index 251d0aabc55a..e1fea7a38019 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c > @@ -389,7 +389,8 @@ static bool vc_slow_virt_to_phys(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt, > pgd_t *pgd; > pte_t *pte; > > - pgd = pgd_offset(current->active_mm, va); > + pgd = __va(read_cr3_pa()); > + pgd = &pgd[pgd_index(va)]; > pte = lookup_address_in_pgd(pgd, va, &level); > if (!pte) { > ctxt->fi.vector = X86_TRAP_PF; Thanks Joerg! With that change in place, this kernel boots normally. What was the problem?