Re: [PATCH v5 03/15] iommu/smmu: Report empty domain nesting info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:38:17PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Jean,
> 
> On 7/16/20 5:39 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:12:49AM +0000, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> >>> Have you verified that this doesn't break the existing usage of
> >>> DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING in drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c?
> >>
> >> I didn't have ARM machine on my hand. But I contacted with Jean
> >> Philippe, he confirmed no compiling issue. I didn't see any code
> >> getting DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING attr in current drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c.
> >> What I'm adding is to call iommu_domai_get_attr(, DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTIN)
> >> and won't fail if the iommu_domai_get_attr() returns 0. This patch
> >> returns an empty nesting info for DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTIN and return
> >> value is 0 if no error. So I guess it won't fail nesting for ARM.
> > 
> > I confirm that this series doesn't break the current support for
> > VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_NESTING with an SMMUv3. That said...
> > 
> > If the SMMU does not support stage-2 then there is a change in behavior
> > (untested): after the domain is silently switched to stage-1 by the SMMU
> > driver, VFIO will now query nesting info and obtain -ENODEV. Instead of
> > succeding as before, the VFIO ioctl will now fail. I believe that's a fix
> > rather than a regression, it should have been like this since the
> > beginning. No known userspace has been using VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_NESTING so
> > far, so I don't think it should be a concern.
> But as Yi mentioned ealier, in the current vfio code there is no
> DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING query yet.

That's why something that would have succeeded before will now fail:
Before this series, if user asked for a VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_NESTING, it would
have succeeded even if the SMMU didn't support stage-2, as the driver
would have silently fallen back on stage-1 mappings (which work exactly
the same as stage-2-only since there was no nesting supported). After the
series, we do check for DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING so if user asks for
VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_NESTING and the SMMU doesn't support stage-2, the ioctl
fails.

I believe it's a good fix and completely harmless, but wanted to make sure
no one objects because it's an ABI change.

Thanks,
Jean

> In my SMMUV3 nested stage series, I added
> such a query in vfio-pci.c to detect if I need to expose a fault region
> but I already test both the returned value and the output arg. So to me
> there is no issue with that change.
> > 
> > And if userspace queries the nesting properties using the new ABI
> > introduced in this patchset, it will obtain an empty struct. I think
> > that's acceptable, but it may be better to avoid adding the nesting cap if
> > @format is 0?
> agreed
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Jean
> > 
> >>
> >> @Eric, how about your opinion? your dual-stage vSMMU support may
> >> also share the vfio_iommu_type1.c code.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Yi Liu
> >>
> >>> Will
> > 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux