On 2020/7/13 下午6:20, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
On 7/13/2020 4:28 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2020/7/12 下午10:49, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
This commit initialize IRQ offloading function pointers in
virtio_vdpa_driver to NULL. Becasue irq offloading only focus
on VMs for vhost_vdpa.
Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
b/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
index c30eb55..1e8acb9 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
@@ -386,6 +386,8 @@ static void virtio_vdpa_remove(struct
vdpa_device *vdpa)
},
.probe = virtio_vdpa_probe,
.remove = virtio_vdpa_remove,
+ .setup_vq_irq = NULL,
+ .unsetup_vq_irq = NULL,
};
Is this really needed consider the it's static?
Thanks
This is for readability, to show they are NULL, so virtio_vdpa would not go through irq forwarding / offloading.
Does this make sense?
Probably not, please refer what is done by other subsystems.
Thanks
Thanks,
BR
Zhu Lingshan
module_vdpa_driver(virtio_vdpa_driver);
