Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] VFIO mdev aggregated resources handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:12:17AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:29:59 +0800
> Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:09:06AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > <...>
> > > > > > We also can't even seem to agree that type is a necessary requirement
> > > > > > for compatibility.  Your discussion below of a type-A, which is
> > > > > > equivalent to a type-B w/ aggregation set to some value is an example
> > > > > > of this.  We might also have physical devices with extensions to
> > > > > > support migration.  These could possibly be compatible with full mdev
> > > > > > devices.  We have no idea how an administrative tool would discover
> > > > > > this other than an exhaustive search across every possible target.
> > > > > > That's ugly but feasible when considering a single target host, but
> > > > > > completely untenable when considering a datacenter.  
> > > > >
> > > > > If exhaustive search can be done just one-off to build the compatibility
> > > > > database for all assignable devices on each node, then it might be
> > > > > still tenable in datacenter?  
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I'm not sure what "one-off" means relative to this discussion.  Is this
> > > > trying to argue that if it's a disturbingly heavyweight operation, but
> > > > a management tool only needs to do it once, it's ok?  We should really  
> > > 
> > > yes
> > >   
> > > > be including openstack and ovirt folks in any discussion about what
> > > > might be acceptable across a datacenter.  I can sometimes get away with
> > > > representing what might be feasible for libvirt, but this is the sort
> > > > of knowledge and policy decision that would occur above libvirt.  
> > > 
> > > Agree. and since this is more about general migration compatibility,
> > > let's start new thread and involve openstack/ovirt guys. Yan, can you
> > > initiate this?
> > >  
> > sure.
> > hi Alex,
> > I'm not sure if below mailling lists are enough and accurate,
> > do you know what extra people and lists I need to involve in?
> > 
> > devel@xxxxxxxxx, openstack-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> > libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> You could also include
> 
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sean Mooney <smooney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>  
> > BTW, I found a page about live migration of SRIOV devices in openstack.
> > https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/stein/approved/libvirt-neutron-sriov-livemigration.html
> 
> Sean, above, is involved with that specification.  AFAIK the only
> current live migration of SR-IOV devices involve failover and hotplug
> trickery.  Thanks,
> 
got it!

Thanks
Yan



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux