On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:39:26AM +0200, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote: > > > How about playing with the batch size? Make it a mod parameter instead > > > of the hard coded 64, and measure for all values 1 to 64 ... > > > > > > Right, according to the test result, 64 seems to be too aggressive in > > the case of TX. > > > > Got it, thanks both! In particular I wonder whether with batch size 1 we get same performance as without batching (would indicate 64 is too aggressive) or not (would indicate one of the code changes affects performance in an unexpected way). -- MST
