On 09/07/20 16:53, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Now as kvm_init_shadow_npt_mmu() is separated from kvm_init_shadow_mmu()
> we always know the MMU context we need to use so there is no need to
> dereference vcpu->arch.mmu pointer.
>
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 15 +++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
This is actually true of all init functions, so we can squash this in too
(my fault for being too concise):
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 2c4fb5684782..78c88e8aecfa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -4850,7 +4850,7 @@ kvm_calc_tdp_mmu_root_page_role(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool base_only)
static void init_kvm_tdp_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- struct kvm_mmu *context = vcpu->arch.mmu;
+ struct kvm_mmu *context = &vcpu->arch.root_mmu;
union kvm_mmu_role new_role =
kvm_calc_tdp_mmu_root_page_role(vcpu, false);
@@ -4989,7 +4989,7 @@ kvm_calc_shadow_ept_root_page_role(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool accessed_dirty,
void kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool execonly,
bool accessed_dirty, gpa_t new_eptp)
{
- struct kvm_mmu *context = vcpu->arch.mmu;
+ struct kvm_mmu *context = &vcpu->arch.guest_mmu;
u8 level = vmx_eptp_page_walk_level(new_eptp);
union kvm_mmu_role new_role =
kvm_calc_shadow_ept_root_page_role(vcpu, accessed_dirty,
@@ -5023,7 +5023,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu);
static void init_kvm_softmmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- struct kvm_mmu *context = vcpu->arch.mmu;
+ struct kvm_mmu *context = &vcpu->arch.root_mmu;
kvm_init_shadow_mmu(vcpu,
kvm_read_cr0_bits(vcpu, X86_CR0_PG),
(BTW, a patch to rename nested_mmu to nested_walk_mmu and guest_mmu to
nested_tdp_mmu would be welcome).
Paolo
