On 7/1/2020 5:04 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
static const int kvm_vmx_max_exit_handlers =
@@ -6830,6 +6838,13 @@ static fastpath_t vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (unlikely(vmx->exit_reason.failed_vmentry))
return EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE;
+ /*
+ * check the exit_reason to see if there is a bus lock
+ * happened in guest.
+ */
+ if (vmx->exit_reason.bus_lock_detected)
+ handle_bus_lock(vcpu);
In case the ultimate goal is to have an exit to userspace on bus lock,
I don't think we will need an exit to userspace on bus lock. See below.
the two ways to reach handle_bus_lock() are very different: in case
we're handling EXIT_REASON_BUS_LOCK we can easily drop to userspace by
returning 0 but what are we going to do in case of
exit_reason.bus_lock_detected? The 'higher priority VM exit' may require
exit to userspace too. So what's the plan? Maybe we can ignore the case
when we're exiting to userspace for some other reason as this is slow
already and force the exit otherwise?
And should we actually introduce
the KVM_EXIT_BUS_LOCK and a capability to enable it here?
Introducing KVM_EXIT_BUS_LOCK maybe help nothing. No matter
EXIT_REASON_BUS_LOCK or exit_reason.bus_lock_detected, the bus lock has
already happened. Exit to userspace cannot prevent bus lock, so what
userspace can do is recording and counting as what this patch does in
vcpu->stat.bus_locks.
