Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Notes on block I/O data integrity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 07:57:55PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > what about LVM? iv'e read somewhere that it used to just eat barriers
> > > used by XFS, making it less safe than simple partitions.
> > 
> > Oh, any additional layers open another by cans of worms.  On Linux until
> > very recently using LVM or software raid means only disabled
> > write caches are safe.
> 
> I believe that's still true except if there's more than one backing
> drive, so software RAID still isn't safe.  Did that change?

Yes, it did change.  That beeing said with the amount of bugs in
filesystems realted to write barriers my expectation for the RAID
and device mapper code is not too high.  I will recommend to keep
doing what people caring for their data have been doing since these
volatile write caches came up:  turn them off.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux