On 24.06.20 22:22, Collin Walling wrote: > KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS and KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED needed > just a little bit of rst touch-up > > Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst > index 056608e8f243..2d1572d92616 100644 > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst > @@ -6134,16 +6134,17 @@ in CPUID and only exposes Hyper-V identification. In this case, guest > thinks it's running on Hyper-V and only use Hyper-V hypercalls. > > 8.22 KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS > +----------------------------- > > -Architectures: s390 > +:Architectures: s390 > > This capability indicates that the KVM_S390_NORMAL_RESET and > KVM_S390_CLEAR_RESET ioctls are available. > > 8.23 KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED > +--------------------------- > > -Architecture: s390 > - > +:Architecture: s390 > > This capability indicates that the Ultravisor has been initialized and > KVM can therefore start protected VMs. > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Thanks, David / dhildenb