Re: [PATCH] target/arm/kvm: Check supported feature per accelerator (not per vCPU)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 03:08:00PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Since commit d70c996df23f, when enabling the PMU we get:
> 
>   $ qemu-system-aarch64 -cpu host,pmu=on -M virt,accel=kvm,gic-version=3
>   Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> 
>   Thread 1 "qemu-system-aar" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>   0x0000aaaaaae356d0 in kvm_ioctl (s=0x0, type=44547) at accel/kvm/kvm-all.c:2588
>   2588        ret = ioctl(s->fd, type, arg);
>   (gdb) bt
>   #0  0x0000aaaaaae356d0 in kvm_ioctl (s=0x0, type=44547) at accel/kvm/kvm-all.c:2588
>   #1  0x0000aaaaaae31568 in kvm_check_extension (s=0x0, extension=126) at accel/kvm/kvm-all.c:916
>   #2  0x0000aaaaaafce254 in kvm_arm_pmu_supported (cpu=0xaaaaac214ab0) at target/arm/kvm.c:213
>   #3  0x0000aaaaaafc0f94 in arm_set_pmu (obj=0xaaaaac214ab0, value=true, errp=0xffffffffe438) at target/arm/cpu.c:1111
>   #4  0x0000aaaaab5533ac in property_set_bool (obj=0xaaaaac214ab0, v=0xaaaaac223a80, name=0xaaaaac11a970 "pmu", opaque=0xaaaaac222730, errp=0xffffffffe438) at qom/object.c:2170
>   #5  0x0000aaaaab5512f0 in object_property_set (obj=0xaaaaac214ab0, v=0xaaaaac223a80, name=0xaaaaac11a970 "pmu", errp=0xffffffffe438) at qom/object.c:1328
>   #6  0x0000aaaaab551e10 in object_property_parse (obj=0xaaaaac214ab0, string=0xaaaaac11b4c0 "on", name=0xaaaaac11a970 "pmu", errp=0xffffffffe438) at qom/object.c:1561
>   #7  0x0000aaaaab54ee8c in object_apply_global_props (obj=0xaaaaac214ab0, props=0xaaaaac018e20, errp=0xaaaaabd6fd88 <error_fatal>) at qom/object.c:407
>   #8  0x0000aaaaab1dd5a4 in qdev_prop_set_globals (dev=0xaaaaac214ab0) at hw/core/qdev-properties.c:1218
>   #9  0x0000aaaaab1d9fac in device_post_init (obj=0xaaaaac214ab0) at hw/core/qdev.c:1050
>   ...
>   #15 0x0000aaaaab54f310 in object_initialize_with_type (obj=0xaaaaac214ab0, size=52208, type=0xaaaaabe237f0) at qom/object.c:512
>   #16 0x0000aaaaab54fa24 in object_new_with_type (type=0xaaaaabe237f0) at qom/object.c:687
>   #17 0x0000aaaaab54fa80 in object_new (typename=0xaaaaabe23970 "host-arm-cpu") at qom/object.c:702
>   #18 0x0000aaaaaaf04a74 in machvirt_init (machine=0xaaaaac0a8550) at hw/arm/virt.c:1770
>   #19 0x0000aaaaab1e8720 in machine_run_board_init (machine=0xaaaaac0a8550) at hw/core/machine.c:1138
>   #20 0x0000aaaaaaf95394 in qemu_init (argc=5, argv=0xffffffffea58, envp=0xffffffffea88) at softmmu/vl.c:4348
>   #21 0x0000aaaaaada3f74 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>, envp=<optimized out>) at softmmu/main.c:48
> 
> This is because in frame #2, cpu->kvm_state is still NULL
> (the vCPU is not yet realized).
> 
> KVM has a hard requirement of all cores supporting the same
> feature set. We only need to check if the accelerator supports
> a feature, not each vCPU individually.
> 
> Fix by kvm_arm_<FEATURE>_supported() functions take a AccelState
> argument (already realized/valid at this point) instead of a
> CPUState argument.
> 
> Reported-by: Haibo Xu <haibo.xu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  target/arm/kvm_arm.h | 25 +++++++++++++------------
>  target/arm/cpu.c     |  2 +-
>  target/arm/cpu64.c   | 10 +++++-----
>  target/arm/kvm.c     |  4 ++--
>  target/arm/kvm64.c   | 14 +++++---------
>  5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/arm/kvm_arm.h b/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
> index 48bf5e16d5..8209525f20 100644
> --- a/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
> +++ b/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #define QEMU_KVM_ARM_H
>  
>  #include "sysemu/kvm.h"
> +#include "sysemu/accel.h"
>  #include "exec/memory.h"
>  #include "qemu/error-report.h"
>  
> @@ -269,29 +270,29 @@ void kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties(Object *obj);
>  
>  /**
>   * kvm_arm_aarch32_supported:
> - * @cs: CPUState
> + * @as: AccelState
>   *
> - * Returns: true if the KVM VCPU can enable AArch32 mode
> + * Returns: true if the KVM accelerator can enable AArch32 mode
>   * and false otherwise.
>   */
> -bool kvm_arm_aarch32_supported(CPUState *cs);
> +bool kvm_arm_aarch32_supported(AccelState *as);
>  
>  /**
>   * kvm_arm_pmu_supported:
> - * @cs: CPUState
> + * @as: AccelState
>   *
> - * Returns: true if the KVM VCPU can enable its PMU
> + * Returns: true if the KVM accelerator can enable its PMU
>   * and false otherwise.
>   */
> -bool kvm_arm_pmu_supported(CPUState *cs);
> +bool kvm_arm_pmu_supported(AccelState *as);
>  
>  /**
>   * kvm_arm_sve_supported:
> - * @cs: CPUState
> + * @as: AccelState
>   *
> - * Returns true if the KVM VCPU can enable SVE and false otherwise.
> + * Returns true if the KVM accelerator can enable SVE and false otherwise.
>   */
> -bool kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPUState *cs);
> +bool kvm_arm_sve_supported(AccelState *as);
>  
>  /**
>   * kvm_arm_get_max_vm_ipa_size:
> @@ -359,17 +360,17 @@ static inline void kvm_arm_set_cpu_features_from_host(ARMCPU *cpu)
>  
>  static inline void kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties(Object *obj) {}
>  
> -static inline bool kvm_arm_aarch32_supported(CPUState *cs)
> +static inline bool kvm_arm_aarch32_supported(AccelState *as)
>  {
>      return false;
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool kvm_arm_pmu_supported(CPUState *cs)
> +static inline bool kvm_arm_pmu_supported(AccelState *as)
>  {
>      return false;
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPUState *cs)
> +static inline bool kvm_arm_sve_supported(AccelState *as)
>  {
>      return false;
>  }
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
> index 5b7a36b5d7..29b314427c 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
> @@ -1108,7 +1108,7 @@ static void arm_set_pmu(Object *obj, bool value, Error **errp)
>      ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
>  
>      if (value) {
> -        if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_pmu_supported(CPU(cpu))) {
> +        if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_pmu_supported(current_accel())) {
>              error_setg(errp, "'pmu' feature not supported by KVM on this host");
>              return;
>          }
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
> index 778cecc2e6..13835768ab 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>  
>      /* Collect the set of vector lengths supported by KVM. */
>      bitmap_zero(kvm_supported, ARM_MAX_VQ);
> -    if (kvm_enabled() && kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPU(cpu))) {
> +    if (kvm_enabled() && kvm_arm_sve_supported(current_accel())) {
>          kvm_arm_sve_get_vls(CPU(cpu), kvm_supported);
>      } else if (kvm_enabled()) {
>          assert(!cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu));
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static void cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
>          return;
>      }
>  
> -    if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPU(cpu))) {
> +    if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_sve_supported(current_accel())) {
>          error_setg(errp, "cannot set sve-max-vq");
>          error_append_hint(errp, "SVE not supported by KVM on this host\n");
>          return;
> @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ static void cpu_arm_set_sve_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
>          return;
>      }
>  
> -    if (value && kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPU(cpu))) {
> +    if (value && kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_sve_supported(current_accel())) {
>          error_setg(errp, "cannot enable %s", name);
>          error_append_hint(errp, "SVE not supported by KVM on this host\n");
>          return;
> @@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ static void cpu_arm_set_sve(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
>          return;
>      }
>  
> -    if (value && kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPU(cpu))) {
> +    if (value && kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_sve_supported(current_accel())) {
>          error_setg(errp, "'sve' feature not supported by KVM on this host");
>          return;
>      }
> @@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ static void aarch64_cpu_set_aarch64(Object *obj, bool value, Error **errp)
>       * uniform execution state like do_interrupt.
>       */
>      if (value == false) {
> -        if (!kvm_enabled() || !kvm_arm_aarch32_supported(CPU(cpu))) {
> +        if (!kvm_enabled() || !kvm_arm_aarch32_supported(current_accel())) {
>              error_setg(errp, "'aarch64' feature cannot be disabled "
>                               "unless KVM is enabled and 32-bit EL1 "
>                               "is supported");
> diff --git a/target/arm/kvm.c b/target/arm/kvm.c
> index eef3bbd1cc..2247a96757 100644
> --- a/target/arm/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/arm/kvm.c
> @@ -208,9 +208,9 @@ void kvm_arm_add_vcpu_properties(Object *obj)
>      }
>  }
>  
> -bool kvm_arm_pmu_supported(CPUState *cpu)
> +bool kvm_arm_pmu_supported(AccelState *as)
>  {
> -    return kvm_check_extension(cpu->kvm_state, KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3);
> +    return kvm_check_extension(KVM_STATE(as), KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3);
>  }
>  
>  int kvm_arm_get_max_vm_ipa_size(MachineState *ms)
> diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c
> index f09ed9f4df..ae4e37ce78 100644
> --- a/target/arm/kvm64.c
> +++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c
> @@ -652,18 +652,14 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
>      return true;
>  }
>  
> -bool kvm_arm_aarch32_supported(CPUState *cpu)
> +bool kvm_arm_aarch32_supported(AccelState *as)
>  {
> -    KVMState *s = KVM_STATE(current_accel());
> -
> -    return kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_ARM_EL1_32BIT);
> +    return kvm_check_extension(KVM_STATE(as), KVM_CAP_ARM_EL1_32BIT);
>  }
>  
> -bool kvm_arm_sve_supported(CPUState *cpu)
> +bool kvm_arm_sve_supported(AccelState *as)
>  {
> -    KVMState *s = KVM_STATE(current_accel());
> -
> -    return kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_ARM_SVE);
> +    return kvm_check_extension(KVM_STATE(as), KVM_CAP_ARM_SVE);
>  }
>  
>  QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_ARM64_SVE_VQ_MIN != 1);
> @@ -798,7 +794,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
>          env->features &= ~(1ULL << ARM_FEATURE_PMU);
>      }
>      if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu)) {
> -        assert(kvm_arm_sve_supported(cs));
> +        assert(kvm_arm_sve_supported(ACCEL(cs->kvm_state)));

Might as well use current_accel() here too, right?

>          cpu->kvm_init_features[0] |= 1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE;
>      }
>  
> -- 
> 2.21.3
> 
>

At all callsites we pass current_accel() to the kvm_arm_<feat>_supported()
functions. Is there any reason not to drop their input parameter and just
use current_accel() internally?

Thanks,
drew




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux