> -----Original Message----- > From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 7:02 AM > To: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@xxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx; joro@xxxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx; > sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx; mingo@xxxxxxxxxx; bp@xxxxxxxxx; > hpa@xxxxxxxxx; pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM:SVM: Add extended intercept support > > Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > The new intercept bits have been added in vmcb control > > area to support the interception of INVPCID instruction. > > > > The following bit is added to the VMCB layout control area > > to control intercept of INVPCID: > > > > Byte Offset Bit(s) Function > > 14h 2 intercept INVPCID > > > > Add the interfaces to support these extended interception. > > Also update the tracing for extended intercepts. > > > > AMD documentation for INVPCID feature is available at "AMD64 > > Architecture Programmer’s Manual Volume 2: System Programming, > > Pub. 24593 Rev. 3.34(or later)" > > > > The documentation can be obtained at the links below: > > Link: > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.a > md.com%2Fsystem%2Ffiles%2FTechDocs%2F24593.pdf&data=02%7C01%7 > Cbabu.moger%40amd.com%7Cbacf7250d8b644d984e308d812b63d74%7C3dd8 > 961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637279922105581873&s > data=%2BGi374uikkiw2c35jk6w%2FYjMnh49R9%2FCw9twf%2BG6i%2FQ%3D&a > mp;reserved=0 > > Link: > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla. > kernel.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D206537&data=02%7C01%7Cbabu.m > oger%40amd.com%7Cbacf7250d8b644d984e308d812b63d74%7C3dd8961fe488 > 4e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637279922105581873&sdata=dMz > wBL9AfZAGYdqLFN9hHtC3BTTkuJLixFHNBl%2FnJbM%3D&reserved=0 > > > > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h | 3 ++- > > arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 6 +++++- > > arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 1 + > > arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/x86/kvm/trace.h | 12 ++++++++---- > > 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h > > index 8a1f5382a4ea..62649fba8908 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h > > @@ -61,7 +61,8 @@ struct __attribute__ ((__packed__)) vmcb_control_area { > > u32 intercept_dr; > > u32 intercept_exceptions; > > u64 intercept; > > - u8 reserved_1[40]; > > + u32 intercept_extended; > > + u8 reserved_1[36]; > > u16 pause_filter_thresh; > > u16 pause_filter_count; > > u64 iopm_base_pa; > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c > > index 8a6db11dcb43..7f6d0f2533e2 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c > > @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ void recalc_intercepts(struct vcpu_svm *svm) > > c->intercept_dr = h->intercept_dr; > > c->intercept_exceptions = h->intercept_exceptions; > > c->intercept = h->intercept; > > + c->intercept_extended = h->intercept_extended; > > > > if (g->int_ctl & V_INTR_MASKING_MASK) { > > /* We only want the cr8 intercept bits of L1 */ > > @@ -142,6 +143,7 @@ void recalc_intercepts(struct vcpu_svm *svm) > > c->intercept_dr |= g->intercept_dr; > > c->intercept_exceptions |= g->intercept_exceptions; > > c->intercept |= g->intercept; > > + c->intercept_extended |= g->intercept_extended; > > } > > > > static void copy_vmcb_control_area(struct vmcb_control_area *dst, > > @@ -151,6 +153,7 @@ static void copy_vmcb_control_area(struct > vmcb_control_area *dst, > > dst->intercept_dr = from->intercept_dr; > > dst->intercept_exceptions = from->intercept_exceptions; > > dst->intercept = from->intercept; > > + dst->intercept_extended = from->intercept_extended; > > dst->iopm_base_pa = from->iopm_base_pa; > > dst->msrpm_base_pa = from->msrpm_base_pa; > > dst->tsc_offset = from->tsc_offset; > > @@ -433,7 +436,8 @@ int nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm) > > trace_kvm_nested_intercepts(nested_vmcb->control.intercept_cr & > 0xffff, > > nested_vmcb->control.intercept_cr >> 16, > > nested_vmcb->control.intercept_exceptions, > > - nested_vmcb->control.intercept); > > + nested_vmcb->control.intercept, > > + nested_vmcb->control.intercept_extended); > > > > /* Clear internal status */ > > kvm_clear_exception_queue(&svm->vcpu); > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c > > index 9e333b91ff78..285e5e1ff518 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c > > @@ -2801,6 +2801,7 @@ static void dump_vmcb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > pr_err("%-20s%04x\n", "dr_write:", control->intercept_dr >> 16); > > pr_err("%-20s%08x\n", "exceptions:", control->intercept_exceptions); > > pr_err("%-20s%016llx\n", "intercepts:", control->intercept); > > + pr_err("%-20s%08x\n", "intercepts (extended):", control- > >intercept_extended); > > pr_err("%-20s%d\n", "pause filter count:", control->pause_filter_count); > > pr_err("%-20s%d\n", "pause filter threshold:", > > control->pause_filter_thresh); > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h > > index 6ac4c00a5d82..935d08fac03d 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h > > @@ -311,6 +311,24 @@ static inline void clr_intercept(struct vcpu_svm *svm, > int bit) > > recalc_intercepts(svm); > > } > > > > +static inline void set_extended_intercept(struct vcpu_svm *svm, int bit) > > +{ > > + struct vmcb *vmcb = get_host_vmcb(svm); > > + > > + vmcb->control.intercept_extended |= (1U << bit); > > + > > + recalc_intercepts(svm); > > +} > > + > > +static inline void clr_extended_intercept(struct vcpu_svm *svm, int bit) > > +{ > > + struct vmcb *vmcb = get_host_vmcb(svm); > > + > > + vmcb->control.intercept_extended &= ~(1U << bit); > > + > > + recalc_intercepts(svm); > > +} > > + > > static inline bool is_intercept(struct vcpu_svm *svm, int bit) > > { > > return (svm->vmcb->control.intercept & (1ULL << bit)) != 0; > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h b/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h > > index b66432b015d2..5c841c42b33d 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h > > @@ -544,14 +544,16 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_nested_vmrun, > > ); > > > > TRACE_EVENT(kvm_nested_intercepts, > > - TP_PROTO(__u16 cr_read, __u16 cr_write, __u32 exceptions, __u64 > intercept), > > - TP_ARGS(cr_read, cr_write, exceptions, intercept), > > + TP_PROTO(__u16 cr_read, __u16 cr_write, __u32 exceptions, __u64 > intercept, > > + __u32 extended), > > + TP_ARGS(cr_read, cr_write, exceptions, intercept, extended), > > > > TP_STRUCT__entry( > > __field( __u16, cr_read ) > > __field( __u16, cr_write ) > > __field( __u32, exceptions ) > > __field( __u64, intercept ) > > + __field( __u32, extended ) > > ), > > > > TP_fast_assign( > > @@ -559,11 +561,13 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_nested_intercepts, > > __entry->cr_write = cr_write; > > __entry->exceptions = exceptions; > > __entry->intercept = intercept; > > + __entry->extended = extended; > > ), > > > > - TP_printk("cr_read: %04x cr_write: %04x excp: %08x intercept: > %016llx", > > + TP_printk("cr_read: %04x cr_write: %04x excp: %08x intercept: %016llx" > > + "intercept (extended): %08x", > > __entry->cr_read, __entry->cr_write, __entry->exceptions, > > - __entry->intercept) > > + __entry->intercept, __entry->extended) > > Nit: I would've renamed 'extended' to something like 'intercept_ext' as > it is not clear what it is about otherwise. Also, if you decide to do > so, you may as well shorten 'intercept_extended' to 'intercept_ext' > everywhere else to be consistent. Or just use 'intercept_extended', with > no 80-character-per-line limitation we no longer need to be concise. With new suggestion from Jim, we probably don’t need this change. Thanks > > > ); > > /* > > * Tracepoint for #VMEXIT while nested > > > > -- > Vitaly
