Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 04/12] s390x: interrupt registration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2020-06-17 10:20, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 11:31:53 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Subject: "s390: I/O interrupt registration" ?

yes, better.


Let's make it possible to add and remove a custom io interrupt handler,
that can be used instead of the normal one.

Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

...snip...

+int unregister_io_int_func(void (*f)(void))
+{
+	if (io_int_func != f)
+		return -1;

Not sure if we really need these checks, but they don't hurt, either.

Not sure neither but I prefer to let it here to avoid more discussions since already reviewed-by...


+	io_int_func = NULL;
+	return 0;
+}
+
  void handle_svc_int(void)
  {
  	report_abort("Unexpected supervisor call interrupt: on cpu %d at %#lx",

Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>


Thanks,
Pierre

--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux