Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 01/12] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/06/2020 10.12, Pierre Morel wrote:
> This patch defines the PSW bits EA/BA used to initialize the PSW masks
> for exceptions.
> 
> Since some PSW mask definitions exist already in arch_def.h we add these
> definitions there.
> We move all PSW definitions together and protect assembler code against
> C syntax.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 15 +++++++++++----
>  s390x/cstart64.S         | 15 ++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> index 1b3bb0c..5388114 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> @@ -10,15 +10,21 @@
>  #ifndef _ASM_S390X_ARCH_DEF_H_
>  #define _ASM_S390X_ARCH_DEF_H_
>  
> +#define PSW_MASK_EXT			0x0100000000000000UL
> +#define PSW_MASK_DAT			0x0400000000000000UL
> +#define PSW_MASK_SHORT_PSW		0x0008000000000000UL
> +#define PSW_MASK_PSTATE			0x0001000000000000UL
> +#define PSW_MASK_BA			0x0000000080000000UL
> +#define PSW_MASK_EA			0x0000000100000000UL
> +
> +#define PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK	(PSW_MASK_EA | PSW_MASK_BA)

PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK sounds a little bit unfortunate - that term rather
reminds me of something that disables some interrupts ... in case you
respin, maybe rather use something like "PSW_EXC_ADDR_MODE" ?
Well, since nobody else complained yet, and the rest of the patch looks
fine:

Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux