On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 01:04:55PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 25/05/20 16:41, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > Concerns were expressed around (ab)using #PF for KVM's async_pf mechanism, > > it seems that re-using #PF exception for a PV mechanism wasn't a great > > idea after all. The Grand Plan is to switch to using e.g. #VE for 'page > > not present' events and normal APIC interrupts for 'page ready' events. > > This series does the later. > > > > Changes since v1: > > - struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data's fields renamed to 'flags' and 'token', > > comments added [Vivek Goyal] > > - 'type1/2' names for APF events dropped from everywhere [Vivek Goyal] > > - kvm_arch_can_inject_async_page_present() renamed to > > kvm_arch_can_dequeue_async_page_present [Vivek Goyal] > > - 'KVM: x86: deprecate KVM_ASYNC_PF_SEND_ALWAYS' patch added. > > > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20200511164752.2158645-1-vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > QEMU patches for testing: https://github.com/vittyvk/qemu.git (async_pf2_v2 branch) > > I'll do another round of review and queue patches 1-7; 8-9 will be > queued later and separately due to the conflicts with the interrupt > entry rework, but it's my job and you don't need to do anything else. Hi Paolo, I seee 1-7 got merged for 5.8. When you say patch 8-9 will be queue later, you mean later in 5.8 or it will held till 5.9 merge window opens. Thanks Vivek
