On 04/06/20 00:17, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 10:39 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> There could be minor conflicts depending on the order you're processing 5.8 >> pull requests. > It would have been good if you had actually pointed to the reports > from linux-next. > > As it was, the hyper-v pull request did do that (thanks Wei Liu), so I > could verify my merge against what had been reported and this didn't > take me by surprise, but it would have good to see that kind of detail > from the kvm pull too.. Ok, I'll keep it in mind. Based on today's report from Stephen, you will get also a conflict with the s390 tree, and a semantic change (build failure) when Thomas sends his large IRQ rework, due to the removal of the second argument to do_machine_check. Paolo
