On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 15:12 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > So at runtime, after all is booted and up and going, you just ripped > cores out from under someone's feet? :) > > And the code really handles writing to that value while the module is > already loaded and up and running? At a quick glance, it didn't seem > like it would handle that very well as it only is checked at ne_init() > time. > > Or am I missing something? > > Anyway, yes, if you can dynamically do this at runtime, that's great, > but it feels ackward to me to rely on one configuration thing as a > module parameter, and everything else through the ioctl interface. > Unification would seem to be a good thing, right? I personally still prefer a sysfs file :) I really don't like module parameters as a way to do such things. Cheers, Ben.
