Re: [PATCH] vfio-ccw: document possible errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 5/27/20 2:19 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2020 15:39:22 -0400
> Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/8/20 6:55 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:33:18 -0400
>>> Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> On 4/7/20 7:16 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:  
>>>>> Interacting with the I/O and the async regions can yield a number
>>>>> of errors, which had been undocumented so far. These are part of
>>>>> the api, so remedy that.    
>>>>
>>>> (Makes a note to myself, to do the same for the schib/crw regions we're
>>>> adding for channel path handling.)  
>>>
>>> Yes, please :) I plan to merge this today, so you can add a patch on
>>> top.  
>>
>> I finally picked this up and realized that the io and async regions both
>> document the return codes that would be stored in a field within their
>> respective regions. The schib/crw regions don't have any such field, so
>> the only values to be documented are the ones that the .read callback
>> itself returns. What obvious thing am I missing?
> 
> The fact that you are right :)
> 
> No need to do anything, I might have spread my own confusion here ;)
> 

Oh, good. I was worried vacation was too long/short. :)

Thanks for confirming; will get back to the other things on the list
instead.



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux