Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] [not for merge] netstats: example use of stats_fs API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Andrew

How do you atomically get and display a group of statistics?

If you look at how the netlink socket works, you will see code like:

                 do {
                         start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&cpu_stats->syncp);
                         rx_packets = cpu_stats->rx_packets;
                         rx_bytes = cpu_stats->rx_bytes;
			....
                 } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&cpu_stats->syncp, start));

It will ensure that rx_packets and rx_bytes are consistent with each
other. If the value of the sequence counter changes while inside the
loop, the loop so repeated until it does not change.

In general, hardware counters in NICs are the same.  You tell it to
take a snapshot of the statistics counters, and then read them all
back, to give a consistent view across all the statistics.

I've not looked at this new code in detail, but it looks like you have
one file per statistic, and assume each statistic is independent of
every other statistic. This independence can limit how you use the
values, particularly when debugging. The netlink interface we use does
not have this limitation.

You're right, statistics are treated independently so what you describe is currently not supported.

In KVM the utilization is more qualitative, so there isn't such problem.
But as long as the interface is based on file access, the possibility of snapshotting might not be useful; however, it could still be considered to be added later together with the binary access.

Jonathan, how is your metricfs handling this case?

Thank you,
Emanuele




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux