On 20.05.20 15:00, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 5/20/20 2:31 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Discarding memory does not work as expected. At the time this is called,
>> we cannot have anyone active that relies on discards to work properly.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> index d06cc04079..7a6158fb99 100644
>> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@
>> #include "trace.h"
>> #include "hw/irq.h"
>> #include "sysemu/sev.h"
>> -#include "sysemu/balloon.h"
>> #include "qapi/visitor.h"
>> #include "qapi/qapi-types-common.h"
>> #include "qapi/qapi-visit-common.h"
>> @@ -2143,7 +2142,7 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms)
>>
>> s->sync_mmu = !!kvm_vm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU);
>> if (!s->sync_mmu) {
>> - qemu_balloon_inhibit(true);
>> + g_assert(ram_block_discard_disable(true));
>
> Please do not evaluate code within an assert() call.
>
Right, thanks for pointing that out.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
