On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:53:35PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 04:30:50PM +0800, Like Xu wrote: > > @@ -203,6 +206,12 @@ static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info) > > case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL: > > msr_info->data = pmu->global_ovf_ctrl; > > return 0; > > + case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES: > > + if (!msr_info->host_initiated && > > + !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PDCM)) > > + return 1; > > I know this is KVM code, so maybe they feel differently, but I find the > above indentation massively confusing. Consider using: "set cino=:0(0" > if you're a vim user. I most definitely don't feel differently. I would be strongly in favor of making that pattern a checkpatch error.
