Re: [TOOL] kprobestest : Kprobe stress test tool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Most of them can be fixed just by adding __kprobes.
Some of them which are already in the another section, kprobes
should check the symbols are in the section.


You mean the blacklist?

I also fear that putting bad kprobed functions into the kprobe
section or into the blacklist may hide some kprobe internal bugs.

Doing so is indeed mandatory for functions that trigger tracing
recursion of things like that, but what if kprobe has an internal
bug that only triggers while probe a certain class of function.

Ie: it would be nice to identify the reason of the crash for
each culprit in these lists.
>
> That may even help to find the others in advance.

Indeed, actually I've found some bugs while making jump-optimization
patches by using this stress test.
But some of them are obviously what we just forget to add __kprobes,
since those will be called from kprobes int3 handling functions.

And also, many lock-related code has been changed. I think
kprobes should use raw_*_lock, or prohibit to probe lock monitoring
functions like lockdep, because it will cause recursive call.


Also kprobes seems to be a very fragile feature (that's what
this selftest unearthes at least for me).
And it really needs a recursion detection that stops every kprobing
while reaching a given threshold of recursion. Something
that would dump the stack and the falling kprobe structure.

Hmm, kprobes already has recursion detection(kp->nmiss), so
maybe, we can check it.


That would avoid such hard lockups and also help to identify
the dangerous symbols to probe.



The problem is that I don't have any serial line in this
box then I can't catch any crash log.
My K7 testbox also died in my arms this afternoon.

But I still have two other testboxes (one P2 and one P3),
hopefully I could reproduce the problem in these boxes
in which I can connect a serial line.

Thank you for helping me to find it!

I've pushed your patches in the following git tree:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/fgrederic/random-tracing.git \
	tracing/kprobes

So you can send patches on top of this one.

Great! I've found another trivial bugs, so I'll fix those on it.

Cool :)

Btw, here is the result of your stress test in a PIII (attaching the log
and the config).

Thanks, I'll check that.

Thank you,

--
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux