Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 04/10] s390x: interrupt registration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2020-05-14 13:58, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 12:45:46 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Let's make it possible to add and remove a custom io interrupt handler,
that can be used instead of the normal one.

Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  lib/s390x/interrupt.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
  lib/s390x/interrupt.h |  8 ++++++++
  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  create mode 100644 lib/s390x/interrupt.h

As the "normal one" means "no handler, just abort", is there any reason
not simply to always provide one? What is the use case for multiple I/O
interrupt handlers?


I can only agree, I proposed this initially.
David asked for a registration.

--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux