Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: x86: Move MPK feature detection to common code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 5/11/20 6:51 PM, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:33 PM Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Both Intel and AMD support (MPK) Memory Protection Key feature.
>> Move the feature detection from VMX to the common code. It should
>> work for both the platforms now.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c   |    4 +++-
>>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c |    4 ----
>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> index 901cd1fdecd9..3da7d6ea7574 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> @@ -278,6 +278,8 @@ void kvm_set_cpu_caps(void)
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>>         unsigned int f_gbpages = F(GBPAGES);
>>         unsigned int f_lm = F(LM);
>> +       /* PKU is not yet implemented for shadow paging. */
>> +       unsigned int f_pku = tdp_enabled ? F(PKU) : 0;
> 
> I think we still want to require that OSPKE be set on the host before
> exposing PKU to the guest.
> 

Ok I can add this check.

+       unsigned int f_pku = tdp_enabled && F(OSPKE)? F(PKU) : 0;



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux